Chain Letter (2009)
Starring: Nikki Reed, Keith David, Brad Dourif
Chain letters. Those annoying spams that's mostly written by some bored tween who's idea of a scary death sounds like a cheap C-list Asian horror. On a hindsight, they used to be creepy when cyberspace was fresh out of the open and when these letters were better written, almost resembling real news bits. Now, with the rampant development of technology, these letters became simple wastes of time that are meant to be thrown to our junk mails.
This 2009 slasher played around with this fact with a deadly twist: what if by ignoring a chain letter that promises your death, you die for real?
A group of teens receives a chain mail from an anonymous web persona that calls itself "The Chain Man"; the mail is to be passed to five others within 24 hours or else they'll meet a terrible fate. As any of us would do in this situation, some of the kids simply ignored this as junk mail; but little do they know, there is indeed a mad man out there hunting and brutally slaughtering those who failed to pass the mail.
As the death toll rises, local detectives started looking into a possible connection between these murders to some anti-technology cult that may had recruited a disfigured and completely homicidal soldier who was tortured back in Iraq for owning an American phone (?!)
We also got some good acting despite some really cheap characters, fun cameos like Brad Dourif as a Sociology Professor, a sensible social commentary that does had its point, and an intimidating killer that boasts creativity within its weapon of choice (Plus, he's by Michael Bailey Smith, AKA Pluto of the impressive The Hills Have Eyes remake!) The problem? Whoever was writing had no idea how to do the rest of the story right.
After the first few killings, the film shifts into an investigative thriller that hardly made sense as connections between these teen murder and an anti-tech cult was forced into the story, dragging what might have been a simple yet fun slasher movie into a messy pile of cinematic mush that had no idea what it wanted to be. The movie just went on with the chain letters and good gore, skipping a climax, tossing away any reason for the teens to fight back, and lead on to an unsatisfying ending that's gleefully messy but hollow none the less.
I can understand that the producers might be trying something new and unpredictable on their hands, but they simply tried too hard. The killer's motive was fine but was there really a need to chuck a sub-plot involving a cult of radicals that hates scientific progress? Was there a need for one of our teen casts to start investigating this matter if she isn't even going to do anything to save her friends or herself? Was there a need for the Chain Man to hoist a victim with chains just to cut his heels with a knife?
That last part, seriously. The killer's big; he could have just kicked the kid's leg joints to the opposite direction before he starts grinding the boy's face with a length of chain. I'm pretty sure it'll work the same way. (Killers and their gimmicks...)
The bottom line is that Chain Letter could have been good if they just kept it modest. Technology in a slasher film is not impossible seeing we have fun titles like Chopping Mall and Laid To Rest; the trick here is focus. My best bet is that it should had focused on the gory deaths seeing we already have tons of tech-oriented thrillers out there like Untraceable and Strangeland (1998), but I guess that is for the producers to figure out should they plan for a sequel.
That is, of course, if it will ever happen.
1 male had his face mutilated with chains
1 male crushed in half by a falling car engine
1 female had her head split open with a toilet lid
1 male snared with a hooked-tipped chain, hooked through the jaw
1 male set on fire
1 female chained between two cars, torn apart
1 male presumably killed