WARNING: THIS BLOG CONTAINS BODYCOUNT. HIGH RISK OF SPOILERS. ENTER IF YOU DARE.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Ask me a Question: Is Patrick Bateman really dead?

For long, we slasher fans, or any horror fans out there, would know that charismatic, serial slasher yuppie Patrick Bateman is dead. Killed off in a snap of a finger, his fate ended at the hands of a little brat who would later grow up to be an FBI agent moonlighting as a serial killer.

By then, we were devastated by the results of what would later follow. Hell, that little bitch couldn't hold the flame to what the real American Psycho had done. Hell she's not even hot! (Gemma Ward is Hot. Pamela Springsteen is Hot. Amber Heard is hot. Her? Not...just annoying) Everything that the first worked up, reduced to standard, stereotyped slasher that offers very little and done a lot of things done before. (way better before...)

But the more I starts to dwell in the fact that Bateman is dead, the more I began to have an epiphany, a revelation of sorts. So I began to question: Is Bateman really dead?

The Thousand Yard stare...
Look at it this way, at the first movie, Bateman hold many aliases such as Paul Allen and Marcus Halberstram, all of it he hated, since he claims that the people who calls him those names always mistook him for another person. Soon enough he murdered the real Paul Allen, hacking his face with an axe while dancing to Huey Lewis' Hip to be Square. After disposing the body, he was left unsuspected by anybody of a crime and claims that Paul had left for London. Later in the film, his psychosis starts to break down to a small-time massacre, shooting number of innocent citizens, an action of which he described in full detail (along with many other killings) to a lawyer over the phone.

The next morning, he met up with his lawyer, who claims it was a joke and mistook Patrick for someone named Davis. Patrick breaks down further, trying to convince the massacre was real, but his lawyer claims to had seen Paul Allen in London and has talked to him. In addition to this, his personal assistant saw a number of detailed drawing of every murder and taboo he had committed.

"TRY GETTING THAT RESERVATION IN DORSIA NOW YOU
STUPID, FUCKING, BASTARD!"
Now, if we're going to put the book's context into this, where the later chapters seems to be more and more delusional, we could assume that it was all in his head, and Bateman didn't commit any of the crimes. Not to mention the number of times he had been mistaken for other people. If this is the case, then what are the odds that Patrick Bateman being the real "Patrick  Bateman"? What if Christian Bale's character is actually just modeling himself to a REAL serial killer, who goes by the name "Patrick Bateman" and just fantasized himself committing these murders and taboos? I mean Christian Bale's character talked a lot about serial killers like Ed Gein and Charles Manson, what are the odds that Bateman, the real Bateman is a separate entity? Who's just as real and fatal as Bale's character.

For all we know, he's psychologically imbalanced and is a ticking-time bomb himself, it would be a matter of time before he starts committing his own brand of murders. All the while, we have another case; In 2002, we have the sequel to this film, smaller in budget and in imagination, about one Rachael Newman attending a university for Behavioral Science, aiming to be an assistant to a beloved professor whom she look up to. Well, it was all peachy-peach until she starts watering down the competition, not to mention unearthing a scandal. She had her own brand of murder and mayhem at the end, but she's actually made infamous for many fans by one act of sin...SHE KILLED BATEMAN! THAT BITCH!


Okay, okay, personal issues aside, We get to see how the sin was commited: Rachael was very young when her babysitter brought home a date, unknown to her her date was really Patrick Bateman. Just as Bateman began to eviscerate his new victim, Rachael escapes and sticked an ice pick into her captor's head. He dead. Rachael lives and soon all hell broke loose.

Now, we could all assume that, due to budget restrains, the sequel hired another face to play as Bateman, who now wears a mask as he commits his crime, but we could also look at it this way: this is the real Patrick Bateman. The real serial killer. the face Christian Bale's character idolizes so much. If this is the case, then Bateman, the real Bateman, is killed by a brat. Bale's character, Bateman's probable number one fan, is still alive, and probably devastated by this fact and would go into further psychosis which would lead to a full blown serial killing, and that slut got away with it and is now an FBI agent.
One day...you'll get bit in the arse, my lady...

That, or the old story:  Bale's character is really Bateman and he finally worked up the guts to commit murders one day, plastic surgeries his face into a different one to avoid suspicion and, after so long, made his first mistake and bit the big one at the hands of a six year old.

Then again, this is just a theory. It's up to the fans of the first, and if any, of the second, to conclude whether this notion is probable or improbable.

So there you have it! Til' next time, mates as I tackle more of horror cinema's hidden and long debated questions!

6 comments:

  1. I've yet to watch American Psycho 2, but it is in my Netflix queue - I would have seen this for Shatner if no other reason - I love me some Shatner.

    Hey, did you get my email? Just wanted to make sure I got the address right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. yeah I got it. sorry dude, but I don't give out my location that easily...paranoiacs need to defend their turf! But thanks though! I'm sure I could find my movies one way or another.

    Also...were you a big fan of the first Am Psycho?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, no problem - I'm kinda with you on the paranoia, actually. I actually got queasy reading the book - knew they would never be able to take the movie that far - Bale was amazing, and the movie was good - but I wish they'd had the guts to get as nasty as the book did...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, unless they remake it, they might now that violence and viscera is now acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The sequel doesn't exist in my mind, especially since Bret Easton Ellis never wrote anything to do with that one in his Bateman chronology. Mila Kunis would never stand a chance against Christian Bale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish it was, too, but it's there...and I watched it...pity me, mate. pity me...

      Delete